ADVERTISEMENT

Britney Spears’ dad Jamie uses her Instagram posts against her in battle to impeach pop star – Socialite Life

ADVERTISEMENT

Britney Spearsestranged father has stepped back to court and again demands that his daughter sit for a grueling statement, Radar has learned.

The legal team that represents Jamie has informed the court that they have no intention of withdrawing. They want Britney to be put under oath and answer questions about her allegations.

In recent years, Britney has been candid about her father and how she thought he mistreated her while she was her curator. She accused him of forcing her to work, forcing her to take medication, depriving her of her right to drive, not showing her friends and family when she wanted to, and spying on her cell phone.

Britney told the court she fears Jamie misused her money and even overpaid her ex-business executives to the tune of $300,000+.

mega

Jamie has been taking steps to try and oust Britney for months. The pop star has refused, accusing Jamie of asking her for one as a form of revenge.

Her powerful lawyer Mathew Rosengart said he believed Jamie made the request only after Britney demanded that he sit down for an explanation himself.

In his new motion, Jamie said California law makes it clear that his daughter MUST sit for a filing. He said as Britney and her counsel continue to “cobble together a series of woefully misguided arguments in a desperate attempt to evade impeachment.”

Jamie said Britney claimed he could get the information he wishes from other parties and wouldn’t help her through it.

mega

In court documents, the pop star’s father even disagreed with Britney’s lawyer who raised the allegations made in the New York Times documentary, Framing Britney Spears

The film featured testimonials from an ex-employee of a security company allegedly hired by Jamie. They claimed that Jamie and Britney’s business managers had signed off that her bedroom was bugged and that her phone calls were tapped without her knowledge.

Also see

Jamie said Britney and her attorney started their motion with “the same recycled, baseless rhetoric and quotes to the New York Timesopening each of Britney’s briefs.’

He argued: “the court has not made any findings against Jamie, nor has Britney’s counsel proved any of these charges with admissible evidence in a court of law. And of course, New York Times articles are neither proof of wrongdoing nor a window into Britney’s personal knowledge of any of her allegations.”

mega

Jamie said he has the right to impeach his daughter in order to “prove with admissible evidence that Britney’s allegations are false and dispel Britney’s allegations regarding the administration of her estate.”

He pointed out that Britney has spoken twice in court. The first on June 23, 2021 and the second in July. Jamie said the singer also posts on Instagram about him and his alleged misdeeds.

Jamie believes that since Britney made the allegations public, he has the right to criticize her on the matter. A judge has yet to decide.

ADVERTISEMENT

ADVERTISEMENT