Fox News coverage seemed at least a little touched by Cassidy Hutchinson’s January 6 testimony

For a moment, it seemed that Tuesday afternoon testimonials from a Jan. 6 committee hearing had broken through on Fox News — a network that had coverage and largely mocked the work of the committee. anchor Bret Baier described ex-White House assistant Cassidy Hutchinsonexplosive statements, in which she said government officials knew January 6 was going to be “bad”, and that Trump knew the crowd was heavily armed and didn’t care, as the most “compelling testimony we’ve heard in many countries on Capitol Hill “. , many years” — a sentiment similar to CNN and MSNBC’s coverage of the hearing.

“I’ve been covering politics for a long time,” said Baier, Fox’s chief political anchor. “I don’t think there’s been a testimony like this — that’s overwhelming in a way — about the workings of a White House in crisis after, you know, right now, on January 6, that we’ve seen since Watergate. ” He further referred to Hutchinson’s… account from hearing “the word ‘Oath Keeper’ and… the word ‘Proud Boys’ closer to scheduling the January 6 meeting when Mr. [Rudy] Giuliani would be nearby.” Even while noting that Trump was refuting Hutchinson’s claims in real time via posts on Truth Social, a social media platform launched by the former president’s media company, Baier added the caveat: “Cassie Hutchinson is under oath on Capitol Hill,” and, ” the president is on Truth Social making his statements.”

Twitter content

This content can also be viewed on the site it arises from from.

It was the kind of coverage that contrasted sharply with the network’s handling of the commission’s first hearing, which Fox News didn’t broadcast live, instead sticking with Tucker Carlson and the regular prime-time lineup. But it soon became apparent that Baier was a minority voice on Fox News, as his primetime colleagues further dismissed the testimony as just “bad acting.”

Sean Hannity called the hearing “hearsay,” orchestrated by an “anti-Trump kangaroo court.” He also downplayed Hutchinson’s claim that Trump was “fucking furious” at the crowd at his January 6 rally and that, as she said, Secret Service agents “didn’t let people through the magazines.” [magnetometer metal detectors] with weapons—[with] what the Secret Service considers weapons.” In response, Hannity, referring to Hutchinson as a “so-called witness,” said that “Trump completely denied this claim and pointed to a simple fact. Zero guns were ever fired by those who broke through the Capitol or in DC that day.”

Similarly, Laura Ingraham, another Fox News host attacked the witness’ credibility, saying, “I spoke to some former White House staffers in the afternoon, three or four, and they knew her well. And no one had anything good to say about her performance today, because they watched.” (Both Hannity and Ingraham’s texts to White House staff around Jan. 6 have come up during the proceedings.)

Still, the tone of the proceedings on some Fox News shows on Tuesday seemed remarkably different. Just after the hearing, Fox News anchor Neil Cavuto early Former Assistant US Attorney Alex Klein, “How much of this has criminal implications for the former president – ​​again, if true?”

“If you’re okay with the fact that there’s a greater risk of harm because people have guns and weapons and they’re marching toward the Capitol, then that shows a real betrayal of your oath and… goes directly in line with charges like seditious conspiracy, said Little. said. “You can say, ‘Hey, I’m not worried about them hurting me.’ But you have to worry that they harm the democratic process and the people in the Capitol.”